Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 16:33:22 04/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 04, 2001 at 13:54:35, Uri Blass wrote:
>On April 04, 2001 at 12:46:04, Fernando Villegas wrote:
>
>>x
>
>Wrong.
>Gambit does only things that christophe told it to do and not the opposite.
Gambit Tiger and Chess Tiger always act according to rules I have told them, but
do you think I can foresee all the consequences of the rules I give to my
programs?
As a result I am surprised every day by the way my programs play.
I think every chess programmer reading this will have a feeling of deja vu.
Actually it is very easy for me to consider Gambit Tiger and Chess Tiger as
independant entities that have not much to do with me.
Anyway they would crush me if I ever tried to play against them...
>Chess programs are always only servants of the programmers.
A very theoric point of view that has no relevance in practice.
>Another point is that GambitTiger and Genius are clearly different chess
>programs.
I guess you forgot the ":)" symbol here ?
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.