Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 06:26:18 04/05/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 05, 2001 at 02:17:25, Jouni Uski wrote: >I use normally 16MB tablebase cache definition in Fritz6 interface. I have got >impression, that with 3+4+some5 piece tables it's good value. Yesterday I >changed size to 0 (=no cache) and compared some endposition with a lot TB >access. To my surprise Fritz now solved all positions faster than with previous >value! What's this meaning? Does this mean, that Windows98 does the catching >better than Fritz GUI? May be it's unnecessary to define any cache for Fritz. > >Jouni You can't specify 0. That probably just leaves it at the default in the fritz stuff.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.