Author: John Merlino
Date: 10:50:37 04/05/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 05, 2001 at 13:35:03, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >On April 05, 2001 at 13:25:25, Daniel Chancey wrote: > >>A few quesitons. >> >>Have you tested it against other CM personalities and other programs? If so, >>how many games against each opponent? I'll add the personality into the list. >> >>I hope that your personality will do well. >> >>Castle2000 > >No this is the first games infact, but it is in the middle of another games ver. >Deep Fritz where the eval is positive: > > Time Depth Score Positions Moves >0:05 1/8 0.68 654310 30...‹e8 31. †a7 ˆg7 32. ˆh6 ˆg8 > 33. ˆxh5 †f6 34. ˆh7 ˆxg3 35. ˆxg3 > ‡xg3 36. ˆxf7 >0:06 1/8 0.73 828409 30...‹e8 31. ˆc7 ˆg7 32. †a4 f5 > 33. †b6 b3 34. ‡c3 bxa2+ 35. ‹xa2 >0:14 1/9 0.80 2037385 30...‹e8 31. ˆc7 ‡g5 32. †c2 f5 > 33. ˆd5 ˆf7 34. ˆxa5 ‡e4 35. †xe4 > fxe4 >0:33 1/10 0.92 5150033 30...‹e8 31. ˆc7 ˆh6 32. ‡e3 ‡ec5 > 33. ‡f5 ‡xd3 34. ‡xh6 e4 35. ‡xf7 > †e5 36. ‡xe5 ‡7xe5 >---- ---- ---- ---- ---- >0:00 1/3 0.46 1665 31. g4 †g7 32. †e3 ˆhh8 >0:00 1/4 0.76 9629 31. g4 ‡b8 32. ˆc7+ ˆd7 33. ˆdxd7+ > ‡xd7 34. †d5 >0:00 1/5 0.64 20244 31. g4 †g7 32. †d5 ‡d6 33. ‡e3 e4 >0:00 1/6 1.04 63636 31. g4 ‡df6 32. ˆc7+ ‡d7 33. †b6 > †g7 34. †xa5 >0:01 1/7 0.81 197737 31. g4 ‡g5 32. ‡e3 e4 33. ‡f5+ > ‹e8 34. ˆd5 ‡xh3 35. †e3 †e5 36. > ˆxa5 >0:02 1/8 0.81 421919 31. g4 ‡g5 32. ‡e3 e4 33. ‡f5+ > ‹e8 34. ˆd5 ‡xh3 35. †e3 †e5 36. > ˆxa5 >0:07 1/9 0.88 1199846 31. g4 ‡g5 32. ˆc7 ‹e8 33. †a4 > f5 34. gxf5 e4 35. ˆd6 ‡xh3 >0:17 1/10 0.98 3101942 31. g4 ‡g5 32. ‡e3 e4 33. ‡f5+ > ‹e8 34. ˆd5 ‡xh3 35. ˆc7 †f6 36. > †e3 ‡g5 37. ˆxa5 > >I will however run a match against other CM8 personalities, and post the results >here. > >Regards >Jonas Just a friendly "heads-up". You'll notice that the analysis that you copied into the above message contains screwed-up characters. This is because you are using the "Figuring Algrebraic" notation setting, which is not good for using the "Copy Contents" feature of the "Thinking Lines" window. If you intend to post any more CM8000 analysis, then you should probably consider switching to Algebraic notation. Glad to hear that CM8 is holding its own against the monster.... jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.