Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is Windows 2000 Professional a good choice for Computer-Chess? (NT)

Author: Scott Gasch

Date: 13:14:10 04/05/01

On April 05, 2001 at 05:59:39, Jason Williamson wrote:
>
>As I do, but in general, most home users have no need for Win2k.
>

That's a strange statement.  I'd argue that anyone who doesn't like their
computer crashing has a need for win2k (or something else besides 9x/ME).  You
know the next version of Windows for home users will be based on the NT kernel
(like Win2k).  So apparently Microsoft has finally concluded that home users
need the stability and security of a serious operating system...

Re: Is Windows 2000 Professional a good choice for Computer-Chess? (NT) Pete Galati 13:58:43 04/05/01
- Re: Is Windows 2000 Professional a good choice for Computer-Chess? (NT) Benny Ng 21:50:46 04/05/01
  - Re: Is Windows 2000 Professional a good choice for Computer-Chess? (NT) Scott Gasch 16:13:37 04/06/01
    - Re: Is Windows 2000 Professional a good choice for Computer-Chess? (NT) Pete Galati 19:11:55 04/06/01
      - Re: Is Windows 2000 Professional a good choice for Computer-Chess? (OT) Paul 21:42:37 04/06/01
        
        Re: Is Windows 2000 Professional a good choice for Computer-Chess? (OT) Lonnie Cook 02:29:08 04/08/01
        
        Re: Is Windows 2000 Professional a good choice for Computer-Chess? (OT) Paul 05:00:25 04/08/01
        
        Re: Is Windows 2000 Professional a good choice for Computer-Chess? (OT) Pete Galati 09:16:04 04/07/01
        
        Re: Is Windows 2000 Professional a good choice for Computer-Chess? (OT) Paul 10:09:29 04/07/01
        
        Re: I wouldn't touch it with a 20 foot pole Pete Galati 17:34:29 04/07/01

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.