Author: Pete Galati
Date: 13:58:43 04/05/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 05, 2001 at 16:14:10, Scott Gasch wrote: >On April 05, 2001 at 05:59:39, Jason Williamson wrote: >> >>As I do, but in general, most home users have no need for Win2k. >> > >That's a strange statement. I'd argue that anyone who doesn't like their >computer crashing has a need for win2k (or something else besides 9x/ME). You >know the next version of Windows for home users will be based on the NT kernel >(like Win2k). So apparently Microsoft has finally concluded that home users >need the stability and security of a serious operating system... My experience with Windows ME is that I've had one thing or another crash about everyday, it's helped to go into msconfig and remove a few things from startup (be very carefull!) but the thing still goes and bites me more often than I can stand. I've been considering upgrading it to 2000 for a while, but because of the cost I've avoided the thing so far (for me it's cheaper to crash). Does Windows 2000 have the ability to start into Dos without a boot floppy? Pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.