Author: Ferdinand S. Mosca
Date: 06:10:26 04/06/01
Good Evening!! Based from games that I have examined Gambit Tiger 2.0 is playing at a different level, of course not all its moves are above the standard level but one or two or maybe more moves are really excellent. I would like to ask if it still be a Gambit Tiger 2.0 when it comes to analyzing a complete game. What will happen if I use the analysis level of fixed time for the whole game, would it consume a lot of time for positions that is very poor or maybe interesting positions? Or just use the fixed time per position. Using the interface Rebel Tiger II for game analysis, Gambit Tiger 2.0 still gives text variation that is started with the actual move of the game even though I use a delta of 0.5, something different from the Chessbase interface, and also why only the text variation and not the replayable variations. I have experienced many problems with the GUI, though not very important but sometimes it can disturbed. How about a winboard version, a bonus for Chessbase version consumers who have also a Rebel 11, and at the same time a chance for winboard engines to play at their home court. Just one engine will do. Regards, Dinan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.