Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: tiger's play too risky ?

Author: Thorsten Czub

Date: 10:46:54 04/06/01

Go up one level in this thread


On April 06, 2001 at 13:35:51, Uri Blass wrote:
>What is the reason that Deep Fritz is winning against Shredder in 2 hours per
>move
>
>See http://www.icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?162134
>
>It cannot be book learning because the programs did not play at this time
>control before and outsearching is part of the game.
>
>I believe that stefan is very good in opening preperation because Deep Fritz
>never wins shredder when stefan is the operator when Fritz can win Shredder when
>stefan is not involved(This is not only Deep Fritz against Shredder5 and Fritz6
>won against shredder4 also in your last tournament and in the israeli league).
>
>Uri

you don't understand me.

you interpret what i wrote the way that i said something negative about
fritz or junior. i did not.

thats why you don't understand me.

i wanted to explain why rebel-tiger, although very strong, loses.

because tactical strength, and knowledge in a position, is not the game.
its only PART of the game. if you follow a plan, AND you are tactical strong,
AND you have knowledge, THAN you win (when your plan was right).
if you only be strong in tactics, and only good in positional, BUT
you do not do anything, THAN you do not win.

you misundertstand me uri.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.