Author: Ulrich Tuerke
Date: 12:46:47 04/06/01
Go up one level in this thread
>.. > >You are right Uli, but by doing this (waiting for the mistake) you are just >going to repeat two decades of computer chess history. > >Genius for example is a great program, and I would be proud if I had written it, >but somebody else has done it already. > >We are the new generation and we must move forward. Users are not impressed >anymore by solid but boring playing style and want something else. > >All the difficulty in Gambit Tiger is to play successful agressive moves. That's >not that easy, as the games you have posted pointed out. > >But that's the direction I have taken. I have to live with both the >congratulations about Gambit's playing style, and also with the humiliating >losses that Gambit has to face because of its playing style. > >I believe that eventually the Gambit approach will win. A program with more >knowledge about king attacks will very often surprise the old generation >programs. I hope so, too. Your first experiences are very promising and encouraging. Good success to Gambit Tiger, I hope it will survive its brother. Uli > > > > Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.