Author: Josh Strayhorn
Date: 18:51:53 04/06/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 06, 2001 at 18:04:24, John Dahlem wrote: >From what I've seen, Tiger's play is just fine. You must remember it is still >only a second generation program, and that it is designed to play risky chess. >Think of Short and most of the very aggressive GMs in history. Their style was >occcasionally their doom, and they would lose to amateurs (I've read Morphy lost >in 13 moves once, but I don't know the story behind it!). But every time they >win, it is a masterpiece. Gambit is made to emulate that, and it does a very >good job, I think. [Event "Alabama"] [Site "Alabama"] [Date "1855"] [Round "-"] [White "Morphy, P."] [Black "Maurian, C."] [Result "0-1"] 1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Bc4 Qh4+ 4. Kf1 b5 5. Bd5 Nc6 6. Nf3 Qh5 7. d4 Nf6 8. Bb3 Ba6 9. Qe2 Nxd4 10. Nxd4 b4 11. Qxa6 Qd1+ 12. Kf2 Ng4# 0-1
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.