Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 02:36:14 04/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 08, 2001 at 05:18:31, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On April 08, 2001 at 05:10:22, Bertil Eklund wrote: > >>Hi! >>Maybee not in your eyes but most other people think so, I believe. >> >>Arguments like: Mickey-Mouse tournament with extra bratwurst (sausage) >>Cheating with the learn-files, to only name a few things. > >and this justifies to censor people ?? > >>If someone says that you cheats or take bribes (without evidence) I call it >>personal attacks. Accusing someone for being bought or receiving bribes, if this >>isn't a personal attack you are right. Hopefully you are in a minority if so. > >hopefully we live in a democracy. and not in a dictatorship where people >like you support censorship. You don't seem to have any idea what democracy is or stands for. In a democracy it is against the law to accuse people of being criminals WITHOUT evidence. It is fully accepted to critisise people and organisations in whatever way you want but to call them corrupted without evidence is way beyond that. As far as I remember you and your supporters are the reason that mr Irazoqui quitted from this Forum. As usual you didn't critisized him with serious arguments, you just declared him corrupt and bought. Later when someone described your methods as very much reminding of the methods used in totalitarian states, you complained to the moderators. Bertil >>Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.