Author: Thomas Lagershausen
Date: 02:47:01 04/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 07, 2001 at 23:20:02, Uri Blass wrote: >On April 07, 2001 at 22:01:59, Christophe Theron wrote: > >>>It is a point but do you rally think Gambit 1333 is better then Deep-x 8x700?! >> >> >> >>For what? >> >>Playing against a computer, playing against a human player, or warming the room >>up? > >I believe that known programs are at disadvantage against kramnik. > >Deep Junior and Deep Fritz are older than tiger so I believe that the >programmers did more changes in these programs so they will be more unknown and >this is the main reason that I believe that they are better against kramnik >unless chessbase release new versions befoe the match against kramnik. Till the match against Kramnik every programer has a new version of his program ready.Even Gambit Tiger 3.0 and also Gandalf 5.0 > >I do not believe in a special setting against strong humans We are not talking of believing.People should do that in churches.I know that Gambit Tiger plays completly different to the chessbaseprograms. and Deep Junior that >has not a special setting against humans did the best performance of computers >against humans. Come on.You can´t mean this poor games at Dortmund.Forget this.Every top 7 program that had a hardware for example 800 Mhz had played Junior´s moves.There were nothing special on these moves.Junior has no defence against anti-computerchess.I would say Junior is helpless against it. Thomas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.