Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:04:32 04/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 08, 2001 at 08:07:59, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: > >>>>Here is my guess for the evidence. >>>> >>>>Gambit1 is probably not better than Deep Fritz on one processor based on Enrique >>>>results. >>> >>>Enrique played 40/40 games.The programs have their own evidence on different >>>timecontrols.One example.DeepFritz is on 5min/game 150 Elo Points stronger than >>>DeepShredder, on timecontrol 40/120 DeepShredder is 50-70 Elo points stronger >>>than DeepFritz.Can you explain that? >> >>I do not believe it. >>I believe that Deep Fritz is better than Deep Shredder in all time controls. >> >>Deep Fritz is winning Shredder5 at 2 hours per move. >>see http://www.icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?162151 > >Uri you are a computerchessexpert.But to come with only one game is not a strong >argument.Is phalanx stronger than Fritz because he can win some games against >Fritz? Why is Shredder winning every official tournament(40/120)and DeepFritz >placed behind Shredder? I would say DeepFritz is the best speedchess progam of >the world but on tournamenttimecontrols it´s only number three. I believe that stefan does better opening preperations. I decided to use Deep Fritz for my correspondence games and I also use the Tigers. I almost do not use Shredder because I believe that Shredder is worse in the early stage of the game and I am not in the endgame. I analyzed some positions with shredder5 and my impression was that it has not more knowledge than Deep Fritz when Deep Fritz is better in tactics. I find that tactics is important even at correspondence games. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.