Author: Chessfun
Date: 09:50:34 04/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 08, 2001 at 08:07:59, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: > >>>>Here is my guess for the evidence. >>>> >>>>Gambit1 is probably not better than Deep Fritz on one processor based on Enrique >>>>results. >>> >>>Enrique played 40/40 games.The programs have their own evidence on different >>>timecontrols.One example.DeepFritz is on 5min/game 150 Elo Points stronger than >>>DeepShredder, on timecontrol 40/120 DeepShredder is 50-70 Elo points stronger >>>than DeepFritz.Can you explain that? >> >>I do not believe it. >>I believe that Deep Fritz is better than Deep Shredder in all time controls. >> >>Deep Fritz is winning Shredder5 at 2 hours per move. >>see http://www.icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?162151 > >Uri you are a computerchessexpert.But to come with only one game is not a strong >argument.Is phalanx stronger than Fritz because he can win some games against >Fritz? Why is Shredder winning every official tournament(40/120)and DeepFritz >placed behind Shredder? I would say DeepFritz is the best speedchess progam of >the world but on tournamenttimecontrols it´s only number three. The 8400 lighting games 1/1 I have played suggest otherwise. They suggest strongly that both Gambit 2.0 and Tiger 14.0 are stronger at speedchess than Deep Fritz. The SSDF will hopefully soon be able to release Shredder results and I believe you will see infact that Deep Fritz is stronger. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.