Author: Urban Koistinen
Date: 10:14:20 04/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 08, 2001 at 10:33:26, Uri Blass wrote: >It does not change the fact that in my example of KQK >finding that a position is in t4 is dependent also on the table t1 and not only >on the tables t3 and d. That is right, t4 is dependent on d, t3, t2, t1 and t0. It is however directly dependent on only d and t3. t4 = and(d, min(positions_reachable_with_one_move_in(t3))) Urban Koistinen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.