Author: Thomas Lagershausen
Date: 14:04:51 04/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 08, 2001 at 12:50:34, Chessfun wrote: >On April 08, 2001 at 08:07:59, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: > >> >>>>>Here is my guess for the evidence. >>>>> >>>>>Gambit1 is probably not better than Deep Fritz on one processor based on Enrique >>>>>results. >>>> >>>>Enrique played 40/40 games.The programs have their own evidence on different >>>>timecontrols.One example.DeepFritz is on 5min/game 150 Elo Points stronger than >>>>DeepShredder, on timecontrol 40/120 DeepShredder is 50-70 Elo points stronger >>>>than DeepFritz.Can you explain that? >>> >>>I do not believe it. >>>I believe that Deep Fritz is better than Deep Shredder in all time controls. >>> >>>Deep Fritz is winning Shredder5 at 2 hours per move. >>>see http://www.icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?162151 >> >>Uri you are a computerchessexpert.But to come with only one game is not a strong >>argument.Is phalanx stronger than Fritz because he can win some games against >>Fritz? Why is Shredder winning every official tournament(40/120)and DeepFritz >>placed behind Shredder? I would say DeepFritz is the best speedchess progam of >>the world but on tournamenttimecontrols it´s only number three. > > >The 8400 lighting games 1/1 I have played suggest otherwise. >They suggest strongly that both Gambit 2.0 and Tiger 14.0 are >stronger at speedchess than Deep Fritz. > >The SSDF will hopefully soon be able to release Shredder results >and I believe you will see infact that Deep Fritz is stronger. > >Sarah. An woman with such a lot of experience like yours i trust like i trust my mother.Sarah can you post me your favorite tiger- and gtgames of your tournament for my tigercollection.I have some games getting from Christophe, so it would be nice to get some from you. Best Thomas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.