Author: José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba
Date: 03:07:04 04/09/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 08, 2001 at 18:05:21, Uri Blass wrote: > >No >The important thing is to go into positions that the computer understand and not >to go into good positions. > >I believe that Stefan knew how to lead shredder to positions that it understands >more than the opponent and this is the main reason for shredder's success. > >Uri Probably Stefan can lead Shredder to positions it understands better than Kramnik! Ok, I have made half joke. I think there are no positions right after the opening which Shredder (or any other program) understands better than Kramnik (but they can understand better some tablebase positions). But in a match of this caliber, I expect the computer team to change the book before every game, just like they do in real computer tournaments, and according to you Stefan is particularly good in this kind of preparations. That is why I think that the good Shredder tournament results are also relevant here. José.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.