Author: Mike S.
Date: 04:09:07 04/09/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 08, 2001 at 22:11:25, ujecrh wrote: >It is often said that Genius 3 was the best but, on the long run, the lack of >learning can be a handicap so Genius 5 may be better in a long match. I share this opinion. I think, Genius 3 should still be considered as one of the best programs for (short) blitz games, or on slower hardware. But the position learning is an important advantage of the follow-up versions: Scheidl,M - Genius5 40/20:00 P133, 1998 1.e4 Nf6 2.e5 Nd5 3.Nf3 d6 4.Bc4 Nb6 5.Bxf7+ Kxf7 6.Ng5+ Kg6 7.Qf3 Kxg5 Here, the position is on duty: This blunder is only played once. [7...Qe8!] 8.Qf7 g6 9.d4+ Kh5 10.Qf4 h6 11.g3 Bg4 12.h3 Qd7 13.hxg4# 1-0 Regards, M.Scheidl
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.