Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Tournament II, Game 1. To Thorsten

Author: Scott Carmichael

Date: 14:01:44 03/30/98

Go up one level in this thread


 The point, Thorsten, without trying to insult you (though I'm sure that
somehow this will (and I still smile and laugh )), is that you did state
that Chessbase and the SSDF had wronglyfully rated Fritz 5, and then
when asked , you showed no proof. Instead you began a debate about
lifestyle and education. Wrongfully, I obliged you and your attempt to
change the topic at hand, and for that I must apologize to all who took
the time to read our posts.
   Still, I would like for you to post your data here so that I might be
able to use it as I continue to look for my own answers. If this is what
you consider being shallow, please forgive all of us who search for a
concrete answer to appease our limited intellects.
   I don't honestly think that anyone here desires to suppress anuone
elses personal opinion, but to claim that certain factions in this
discussion cheated, or manipulated the games so as to show a better
result than a program is capable of , and then not share your proof is
not only an insult, but is slanderous.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.