Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 05:03:24 04/10/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 10, 2001 at 07:38:51, Jason Williamson wrote:
>On April 09, 2001 at 16:39:45, Bertil Eklund wrote:
>
>>On April 09, 2001 at 16:20:42, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>>On April 09, 2001 at 14:43:32, Tony Hedlund wrote:
>>>
>>>>On April 09, 2001 at 13:56:05, Mike S. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On April 09, 2001 at 11:38:02, Hans Christian Lykke wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>(...)
>>>>>>[White "Deep Fritz K6-2 450 128MB"]
>>>>>>[Black "CM8000 K6-2 450 128MB"]
>>>>>>(...)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>{74MB, Deepfr~1.ctg. K6-2 450 128MB}
>>>>>
>>>>>I must admit that I probably misunderstood the SSDF hash size information until
>>>>>now. I always thought, each program uses 128 MB hash. Now, it looks to me as if
>>>>>this is just the total RAM memory of the pcs used (?), i.e., here Deep Fritz was
>>>>>set to 74 MB Hash. This would mean, the list itself doesn't contain the hash
>>>>>size info. With which hash size is Chessmaster 8000 tested?
>>>>>
>>>>>I apologize if this has already been discussed, and the information given here
>>>>>before respectively (which I didn't notice), but: What is the general SSDF
>>>>>policy regarding the hash size setting (I hope you aren't testing CM8K in the
>>>>>default setting of only 1 MB hash)?
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks,
>>>>>M.Scheidl
>>>>
>>>>We are running CM8000 with 32MB hash.
>>>>
>>>>Tony
>>>
>>>
>>>Since this will obviously be asked soon, why use Fritz with 74mb and CM8000 with
>>>only 32mb???
>>Hi!
>>
>>The main reason is that 32mb is max. The second is that mr de Koning told us
>>that 16mb was more then enough for P200MMX.
>>
>>As a general rule, we try to follow the recommendations from the programmers if
>>there are no known recommendations, we use as much as possible (no swapping
>>allowed).
>>
>>Bertil
>
>
>32 megs is NOT the max hash size. I run Chessmaster with 64 megs on my dual
>celeron 400 (192 megs total ram), and can go quite a bit higher. Perhaps I am
>not understanding what you are saying.
Hi!
Sorry, max is 62 mb but according mr de Koning if you use "to big hashtables" it
make the program slower. 64mb is to much for a "slow" computer. If you plays
with higher time-controls then 2h/40 it can of course be good.
Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.