Author: Brian Kostick
Date: 07:58:02 04/10/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 10, 2001 at 01:27:10, Dann Corbit wrote: >On April 09, 2001 at 23:46:30, Brian Kostick wrote: > >>On April 09, 2001 at 12:45:38, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On April 09, 2001 at 07:23:29, Jouni Uski wrote: >>> >>>>I don't follow any of these games. It's a little difficult to get statistically >>>>significant number of games e.g. 40-200 games :-) >>> >>>If they give some people a bit of fun, then they are not a waste of time. >>> >>>I don't think that they are meaningful. But that's just my opinion. >> >>Dann, >> >> I move in a quote from John M: >> >>>>Fun? Definitely.... especially when "The Web" makes two inaccuracies against >>>>CM8000 and was down by 1.5 after less than 25 moves.... ;-) >> >>>>But "meaningful"...? of course not.... That doesn't mean the marketing boys >>>>won't have a field day with it if CM8000 wins, though.... >> >> I once doubted you when you said The Web wouldn't play soundly. Well if you >>want, I will send you 'shoe shine' money. > >I usually wear sneakers. > >>It wasn't to hard for me to realize >>your advice had merit. Yes, play as "The Web" just for fun, I've no need for a >>coronary when they blow it. Regards, BK > >What sort of chess game will a trillion voting monkeys play? Thanks to the >advent of USENET, now we can find out! >;-) > >Maybe they'll hit the wrong keys and we'll get a copy of Shakespear instead. Maybe so. However, anytime I feel the need to call them monkeys I just donate some time to scholastic chess. If I really need a grounding I travel to Chicago to have some of the bigger monkeys beat on my game. I always seem to learn more from a loss and realize I'm just a little fish in a big pond. Regards, Brian K.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.