Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 10:27:26 04/10/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 10, 2001 at 11:08:44, Ralf Elvsén wrote: >On April 09, 2001 at 15:20:08, Bertil Eklund wrote: > >>On April 09, 2001 at 13:53:02, John Smith wrote: >> >>>Under the about taskbar icon, credit is given to Richard Lang. I'm not sure >>>where the gentleman in a previous post came up with the "cracked by..." >>>information. >>> >>>Very strong prog. Stronger than my Nimzo 732 or Hiarcs 732 in preliminary >>>testing. Primitive GUI coupled with tiny hash table, give it a retro look. >>> >>>But it is strong. >> >>Hi! >> >>You can use 32mb hashtables, not to bad. It can compete rather well in blitz but >>in 2h/40 it is another story. >> >>Bertil > >In the first game I played against it it gave away a pawn for nothing >in a dead drawn pawn endgame, so I won easily. "What a piece of junk" >I thought. Then I lost five games in a row... > >Is it weak in endgames? Otherwise I thought it had an "elegant" style. >Hard to put the finger on, but it was very fun to play. > >Ralf At the time it was considered to be strong in endgames. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.