Author: Günther Simon
Date: 05:26:30 04/11/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 11, 2001 at 02:57:07, Uri Blass wrote: >On April 11, 2001 at 02:44:08, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On April 11, 2001 at 02:32:52, Marcus Kaestner wrote: >> >>>see here: >>> >>>http://mitglied.tripod.de/ChessBits/index.html ><snipped> >>Tiger playd at least 93 games out of 128 against the same opponent(Deep Shredder >>dual). > >It should be 93 out of 118. > >Tiger14's average opponents rating are 3032. > >If I assume 93 games against Deep Shredder and 25 games against number 3 then I >get average:(93*3037+25*3013)/118<3032 > >It can be sligtly less than 93 games because every number that is bigger than >3031.5 can be 3032. >The numbers 3037 are not accurate and I can assume 3037.5 and 3013.5 but it is >clearly at least 88 out of 118 because >(88*3037.5+30*3013.5)/118<3031.5 > >Uri Why do you wonder about this? This is the normal way of testing by MK and further more this list you mention contents games from various unknown+different time controls. And what about the absolute number of the ratings? They are far beyond any logic! [Mostly above 2900 :)))))))))isn't this ridiculous?] Günther
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.