Author: José Carlos
Date: 06:21:46 04/11/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 10, 2001 at 17:44:26, Jon Dart wrote: >On April 10, 2001 at 09:16:28, José Carlos wrote: > > >> I even recall that, some time ago, I think it was John Dart that made a test >>reducing the resolution of his eval to 1/4 pawn, but I actually can't remember >>how did it work. > >I don't recall ever doing that - maybe you're thinking of someone else. Sorry then. Maybe it was Dan Homan, I'm not sure. Anyway, I don't to start a "maybe it was x" and x responding "nope, it wasn't me" long thread :) so I'll forget about. This memory of mine... if only I could put a couple mirrored hard disks in my head, in case one of them crashed :) >My eval has had scores with value 64 = 1 pawn for a long time - I think way back >to version 1.0. > >--Jon BTW, what's the reason, in your case, to use such a way of measuring eval? It seems logical to me to set the 'one' (or 100) anywhere, so the eval could be more easyly understood, though I guess you're already used to use the 64/pawn units. José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.