Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Tiger 14 clearly played most of the games against Deep shredder

Author: Günther Simon

Date: 12:13:05 04/11/01

Go up one level in this thread


On April 11, 2001 at 11:59:39, Marcus Kaestner wrote:

>
>>Why do you wonder about this?
>>This is the normal way of testing by MK
>
>and is this your normal way of writing?
>posting nonsense without thinking, even without reading?
>
>>and further more this list you mention
>>contents games from various unknown+different
>>time controls.
>
>you should better read carefully.
>it´s the blitz-rating list.
>
>>And what about the absolute number of the ratings?
>>They are far beyond any logic!
>>[Mostly above 2900 :)))))))))isn't this ridiculous?]
>
>only far beyond your logic. nearly every good program has a blitz-rating above
>2900 on nowadays hardware. and the average rating is settled by games against
>humans. you should better think twice before writing nonsense.
>
>but why do i spend my time with people like you?
>people who only wants to discredit me.
>
>time wasting...


I dont want to discredit you but why do you pretend this datas
refer to a Blitz-ranking? Anyone can see that the new rating list
is called an whole around rating list and the definition of
this rating list on your site says the same as I tell you now...
And so did Uri before.

Regards,Günther



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.