Author: Chessfun
Date: 12:32:03 04/12/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 12, 2001 at 10:52:21, Paul Doire wrote: >Feels good ....right! > >These things I learned here, as I said before ..."Do unto others as you would >have them do unto you" > >Paul No offense meant but when you make a post saying specifically as you did in message http://site2936.dellhost.com/forums/1/message.shtml?162675 "CM KKND is clearly stronger in this sampling." This after a One point difference in 24 5 minute games. followed by; "I have also played many offhand games with CM KKND against Gambit Tiger 2...G/5 same pc ponder on, and CM KKND appears to win 60-70% of the time!" How did you expect people to react. The replies I read were by John and Dann. In both cases I never saw much to be offended by. I have seen far worse. You had posted a similar complaint to this about 3 months ago, when you said the author should give all details of results and then ignore your own comment. You have since recanted your first statement with; http://site2936.dellhost.com/forums/1/message.shtml?162945 "After reading John Merlino's post about excessive hash clearing under the current patched version of CM8000, I decided to try the top two candidates from my last tourney with only one meg hash each. As you can see the results this time are much different." You post a message Computer results and comments and follow it up with headers like "Some just don't get it (NT)" and "At least 2 people understand" then use a lame excuse _above_as the reason why you are rude. Seems like you have two sets of rules and only one set applies to you. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.