Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 14:54:40 04/13/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 13, 2001 at 16:35:20, Tomas Casanovas Martinez wrote: >On April 13, 2001 at 16:24:46, John Dahlem wrote: > >>Are you aware that the Tigers are going to always be running on less hardware >>than their opponents? > >Yes, John. Anyway, they have performed fantastically in the first round. Only as >a reference, I have observed the nodes per second of these six programmes around >move 30 of each game (a 'quick and dirty' estimate, of course!): > >In Pentium 4, 1.4 Ghz. > >Deep Shredder: 245.000 nps. >Gambit Tiger2: 240.000 nps. >Deep Junior: 730.000 nps. > >In Pentium 3 dual 2x933 Mhz. > >Deep Fritz: 825.000 nps. >Chess Tiger 14: 280.000 nps. >Gandalf 432h: 240.000 nps. > >By the way, Shredder clock runs about 25% faster than all other programmes. I >have to give him 75 minutes instead of 60 for a one hour game!. > >Regards, > >Tom Those node counts is higher on my t-bird 1.3ghz >Deep Shredder: 245.000 nps. >Gambit Tiger2: 240.000 nps. >Deep Junior: 730.000 nps.-->(t-bird) 950.000 nps. > >In Pentium 3 dual 2x933 Mhz. > >Deep Fritz: 825.000 nps.--> 1.000.000 nps >Chess Tiger 14: 280.000 nps. >Gandalf 432h: 240.000 nps.--> 350.000 This is offcause not a post to say, my hardware is faster than yours, but it is interesting to see the difference between Pentium/pentium dual and AMD T-bird I hope you won't take this the wrong way, by the way very iteresting games, i will be looking foreward to the upcoming rounds :-) Regards Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.