Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 02:23:24 04/14/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 13, 2001 at 16:03:50, Tomas Casanovas Martinez wrote:
>
>I have just finished the first round of my new tournament. Invited engines:
>
>Deep Fritz, Deep Junior, Deep Shredder, Chess Tiger 14.0, Gambit Tiger 2 and
>Gandalf 432h. 10 rounds.
>
>60 minutes game. Operated manually.
>
>White plays in a Pentium 4 1.4 Ghz
>Black plays in a Dual Pentium 3 2x933 Mhz (About one third faster than my
>Pentium 4)
Hello, i do not speak for other programs but nearly.
a P4 at 1.4Ghz is about the speed of a 800MhzPIII for DIEP.
Not to mention dual it is even slower because of increased latencies
for locking. Only measured single cpu version...
So a dual PIII 933 is going to be well over 2 times faster as a 1.4Ghz p4.
Now that is speed for DIEP.
I have a big pity with the programs on the slower hardware especially
if the level is fast and operator slow as you lose like 20 minutes
a program a game then which results in 45 0 level :)
Here my second game slower or equal to 15 0 level against chess tiger 14.0:
I played at fics. i did not play standard level before at fics, hence
UNR:
Diepeveen (UNR) vs. RebelRex (2441) --- Fri Apr 13, 11:00 PDT 2001
Rated standard match, initial time: 15 minutes, increment: 15 seconds.
Move Diepeveen RebelRex K7-1333Mhz or 1.33Ghz DDR-RAM.
---- ---------------- ----------------
1. e4 (0:00) e6 (0:00)
2. d4 (0:03) b6 (0:00)
3. Nc3 (1:33) d5 (0:20)
4. e5 (0:53) c5 (0:21)
5. Nf3 (0:09) Nc6 (0:15)
6. Bb5 (0:05) Bd7 (0:14)
7. Bxc6 (0:10) Bxc6 (0:03)
8. O-O (0:02) Ne7 (0:24)
9. Bg5 (0:07) h6 (0:20)
10. Bxe7 (0:08) Bxe7 (0:16)
11. Ne2 (0:01) O-O (0:44)
12. c3 (0:03) Qd7 (0:18)
13. Re1 (0:06) Ba4 (0:10)
14. Qd2 (0:14) Bb5 (0:03)
15. Rac1 (0:12) Rab8 (0:16)
16. h3 (0:04) Rfc8 (0:21)
17. Nf4 (0:12) cxd4 (0:46)
18. Nxd4 (0:39) Bc4 (0:18)
19. b3 (0:08) Ba6 (1:22)
20. g3 (0:02) Ba3 (0:15)
21. Rb1 (0:05) Qc7 (0:15)
22. Re3 (1:15) Be7 (0:00)
23. h4 (0:03) Bc5 (0:16)
24. b4 (0:25) Bf8 (0:15)
25. Nfe2 (0:28) Bc4 (0:19)
26. f4 (0:08) Ra8 (0:13)
27. a4 (0:15) a5 (0:21)
28. b5 (0:06) Qd7 (0:21)
29. Nc6 (0:19) Bc5 (0:26)
30. Ned4 (0:04) Qc7 (0:12)
31. Kh2 (0:33) Qb7 (0:15)
32. Rf3 (1:17) Rc7 (0:22)
PLEASE LOOK AT THIS POSITION. How would
Kramnik do against such beginners?
A beginner positionally outplaying Tiger by at
least 1000 positional points. Tactical of course 1000 less,
hence it gets a draw.
33. Kh1 (1:16) Qc8 (0:20)
34. Qc2 (0:39) Kh8 (0:14)
35. Rd1 (0:41) Qg8 (0:19)
36. g4 (0:04) Qf8 (0:28)
37. Rd2 (0:11) Qe8 (0:13)
38. Rg2 (0:15) Rac8 (0:15)
39. Qd1 (1:48) Qf8 (0:13)
40. Rfg3 (0:10) Bxd4 (0:19)
41. cxd4 (1:27) f6 (0:17)
42. g5 (1:26) fxg5 (1:15)
43. fxg5 (3:40) Qf4 (0:00)
44. Rg4 (1:17) Qf1+ (0:13)
45. Qxf1 (0:04) Bxf1 (0:05)
46. Rf2 (0:04) Bh3 (0:19)
47. Rgf4 (0:07) Bf5 (1:45)
48. Rxf5 (0:16) exf5 (0:00)
49. Rxf5 (0:13) g6 (0:15)
50. Rf6 (0:08) hxg5 (0:19)
51. hxg5 (0:03) Kg7 (0:52)
52. Kg2 (1:11) Rh8 (0:22)
53. Kg3 (0:07) Rf7 (0:16)
54. Kg4 (0:45) Rhf8 (0:00)
55. Kf4 (0:16) Rh8 (0:00)
56. Kg4 (0:02) Rhf8 (0:17)
57. Kf4 (0:02) Rh8 (0:17)
58. Kg4 (0:09)
{Game drawn by repetition} 1/2-1/2
So my score now is 1.5 out of 2 against Tiger14/Gambit tiger 2.0
>ROUND 1
>
>Gambit Tiger - Deep Fritz 1-0
>Deep Shredder - Chess Tiger 0-1
>Deep Junior - Gandalf 432h 0,5-0,5
>
>CLASSIFICATION AFTER ROUND 1
>
>Gambit Tiger and Chess Tiger 1
>Deep Junior and Gandalf 0,5
>Deep Fritz and Deep Shredder 0
>
>The games:
>
>BARCELONA 2001 – FIRST ROUND
>
>Deep Junior P4 1.4- Gandalf 4.32h P3 dual 2x933
Gandalf cannot even use the P3 for parallellism.
>Level=Blitz:60'. Barcelona - Spain, 13.04.2001
> 32MB, GENERAL.ctg. PC–1
>
>1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.g3 Bg7 4.Nf3 0–0 5.Nc3 d6 6.Bg2 Nbd7 7.0–0 e5 8.e4 c6 9.b3
>exd4 10.Nxd4 Re8 11.h3 Nc5 12.Re1 a5 13.Rb1 Nfd7 14.Be3 Ne5 15.Re2 Qc7 16.Rd2 b6
> 0.62/10 1:10 17.f4 Ned7 0.56/10 32 18.e5 Bb7 1.00/10 1:40 19.exd6 Qxd6
>0.54/10 26 20.Nc2 Qc7 0.19/11 1:01 21.Ne4 Re7 0.16/10 0 22.Nxc5 Nxc5
>0.01/10 52 23.Bxc5 bxc5 0.01/12 1 24.Qf3 a4 0.01/10 0 25.Rbd1 axb3
>-0.01/10 1:26 26.axb3 Rae8 -0.11/11 56 27.Kh1 f5 -0.09/10 56 28.h4 Re6
>-0.14/10 50 29.h5 R6e7 0.00/10 1:44 30.Kh2 Kh8 0.00/10 53 31.Rd6 Re6
>0.12/10 1:16 32.Rxe6 Rxe6 0.06/11 1:40 33.Rd3 Bf6 0.00/10 37 34.Rd2 Rd6
>-0.03/10 41 35.Re2 Rd8 0.00/10 39 36.Qf2 gxh5 -0.09/10 39 37.Qxc5 h4
>-0.28/11 1:30 38.Qxf5 hxg3+ 0.00/10 26 39.Kxg3 Rf8 0.03/9 32 40.Kh2 Bc8
>-0.12/10 23 41.Qe4 c5 -0.19/9 14 42.Kg1 Qg7 -0.03/10 1:24 43.Qd5 Bf5
>-0.24/10 0 44.Kf1 Bxc2 -0.24/9 9 45.Rxc2 Bd4 -0.70/9 0 46.Qe4 Qg4
>-0.51/11 1:20 47.Bf3 Qg1+ -0.51/9 1:10 48.Ke2 Rg8 -0.43/10 1:10 49.Rd2
>Bc3 -0.20/11 34 50.Rd1 Qh2+ -0.20/9 1 51.Ke3 Qb2 -0.17/8 0 52.Be2 Rf8
>-0.03/10 0 53.Kf2 Be5 0.00/9 0 54.Kg2 Rxf4 -0.19/10 1:09 55.Rd8+ Kg7
>-0.19/9 5 56.Qb7+ Rf7 -0.16/9 24 57.Qe4 Bf4 -0.06/9 0 58.Qe6 Qf6
>-0.08/9 0 59.Qxf6+ Rxf6 -0.08/12 1 60.Rd5 Bd6 -0.06/13 25 61.Kh3 Rh6+
>-0.04/13 33 62.Kg4 Rg6+ -0.04/14 20 63.Kf3 h6 -0.04/13 0 64.Bd1 Rf6+
>-0.06/12 42 65.Ke4 Kf7 -0.06/12 32 66.Rd3 Kg6 -0.06/13 31 67.Kd5 Kg5
>-0.03/13 29 68.Be2 Kh4 -0.08/13 31 69.Re3 Bf8 -0.12/12 27 70.Re5 Kg3
>-0.11/13 21 71.Re4 Rf5+ -0.09/13 47 72.Ke6 Rg5 -0.01/14 45 73.Bd1 Bg7
>-0.09/12 21 74.Re3+ Kf2 -0.08/12 1 75.Rd3 Ke1 -0.06/12 53 76.Bc2 Rg2
>-0.06/12 33 77.Bb1 Rf2 -0.01/10 21 78.Rg3 Re2+ -0.01/11 48 79.Kd5 Re5+
>-0.01/13 40 80.Kc6 Bf8 -0.12/13 24 81.Rg8 Be7 -0.17/12 17 82.Kd7 Kd2
>-0.17/12 1 83.Rg7 Bg5 -0.24/12 23 84.Rf7 Re3 -0.48/12 29 85.b4 Rb3
>-0.27/12 32 86.bxc5 Rb7+ -0.17/11 1 87.Ke6 Rxb1 -0.17/12 0 88.c6 Re1+
>0.00/12 22 89.Kd5 Re8 0.00/11 0 90.c7 Kd3 0.00/12 0 91.c5 Rg8 0.00/12
>0 92.Kc6 Be3 0.01/11 17 93.Kb7 Bxc5 0.01/12 39 94.Rh7 Be3 0.00/12 5
>95.Rd7+ Ke2 0.00/13 19 96.Rf7 Rh8 0.00/12 19 97.c8Q Rxc8 0.06/13 9
>98.Kxc8 Kd3 0.09/14 15 99.Kd7 Ke4 0.16/14 0 100.Ke6 Bf4 0.17/14 1
>101.Rf5 Bg5 0.20/15 0 ½–½
>
>(1) Gambit Tiger P4 1.4 - Deep Fritz Dual P3 933x2 [D74]
>Level=Blitz:60'. Barcelona - Spain, 13.04.2001
>[Tom Casanovas]
> 32MB, GENERAL.ctg. PC–1
Poor gambit tiger.
Note you used the wrong book with gambit tiger which
by accident is it's luck against deep fritz, the normal tournament book is
getting killed by deep fritz but this g3 crap isn't.
Most auto232 games i receive from tiger i get back these craplines too
btw. Also playing 1.g3 at move=1 and such.
Deep fritz can use the dual bigtime. Fairer is to set threads to 1
>1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 g6 3.c4 Bg7 4.g3 d5 5.cxd5 Nxd5 6.Bg2 0–0 7.0–0 Nc6 8.e4 Nb6 9.d5
>Na5 10.Qc2 e6 0.09/12 2:12 11.Bg5 f6 12.Bd2 0.16/11 5 Nac4 0.12/13 6
>13.Bb4 Rf7 0.12/11 3 14.Nd4 Qe8 0.22/10 7 15.b3 Nd6 0.00/11 9 16.dxe6
>Bxe6 0.00/11 5 17.Nc3 f5 0.28/11 1:17 18.Rad1 fxe4 0.25/11 4 19.Bxd6
>cxd6 0.25/10 3 20.Nxe4 Rd7 0.72/11 12 21.Rfe1 Bg4 0.94/13 1:24 22.Nf6+
>Bxf6 1.12/16 1:06 23.Rxe8+ Rxe8 1.22/14 14 24.f3 Bxd4+ 1.28/14 3:53
>25.Rxd4 Re1+ 1.22/13 27 26.Kf2 Bf5 1.59/14 49 27.Qc3 Re8 1.34/13 1:00
>28.Qa5 Nc8 1.41/13 16 29.f4 Rde7 1.31/12 1:00 30.Rd2 h6 1.41/13 47
>31.Qb4 b6 1.34/13 1:30 32.Qc3 Kf7 1.50/13 2:12 33.Bc6 Rf8 1.59/13 58
>34.Bd5+ Be6 1.72/14 1:14 35.Qc4 Bxd5 1.84/13 1:55 36.Qxd5+ Kf6 2.03/14 0
> 37.Rc2 Rd7 2.12/13 16 38.Re2 Kg7 1.91/14 1:55 39.Re6 Rdf7 2.03/14 40
>40.Qd4+ Kh7 1.94/15 36 41.Qe4 Rg7 2.06/15 17 42.Ke3 h5 2.19/14 50 43.h3
>Rff7 2.41/14 8 44.g4 Re7 2.81/15 0 45.f5 Rxe6 2.72/14 46 46.fxe6 hxg4
>3.34/16 0 47.hxg4 Rc7 3.50/15 21 48.Qa8 a5 3.72/15 0 49.Qb8 Rc5 4.47/15
> 39 50.Kf3 Rc1 4.78/14 45 51.Qb7+ Kh8 5.59/15 0 52.e7 Nxe7 6.50/15 45
>53.Qxe7 Rf1+ 6.66/14 59 54.Ke2 Rc1 6.84/13 1:12 55.Qf8+ Kh7 5.62/7 0
>56.Qf7+ Kh8 8.59/15 52 57.Qxg6 Rc7 8.62/13 33 58.g5 Rg7 8.81/14 1:23
>59.Qxd6 1–0
>
>
>Tournament: April 2001 - Tom Casanovas
>Place: Barcelona - Spain
>Round: 1
>Date: 12/4/2001
>White: Shredder 5
>Black: Chess Tiger 14.0
Shredder is suffering BIGTIME on a p4.
>Clear victory for Chess Tiger 14.0 (Dual P3-933) against Deep Shredder (P4-1,4
>Ghz.).
>1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Bg5 Bb4 5. Ne2 dxe4 6. a3 Be7 7. g3 Nc6 8. Bg2
>O-O 9. O-O a6 10. Rb1 h6 11. Bxf6 Bxf6 12. Nxe4 Bxd4 13. Nxd4 Nxd4 14. c3 Nf5
>15. Qxd8 Rxd8 16. Rbd1 Re8 17. Rd3 Rb8 18. b4 b6 19. Re1 Bb7 20. Rd7 Rec8 21. f4
>Kf8 22. Kf2 Bc6 23. Rdd1 Rd8 24. h4 Ba4 25. Rc1 Rd7 26. Bf1 Bc6 27. h5 Bb7 28.
>g4 Ne7 29. Kg3 Ra8 30. c4 a5 31. b5 Rd4 32. Nf2 Rad8 33. c5 Ra4 34. Ra1 Rdd4 35.
>Nd3 Rdc4 36. Rec1 Be4 37. Rxc4 Rxc4 38. cxb6 cxb6 39. Ne5 Rc3+ 40. Kf2 Nd5 41.
>Re1 f5 42. gxf5 exf5 43. a4 Ke7 44. Ng6+ Ke6 45. Be2 Rc2 46. Kf1 Kd6 47. Ra1 Kc5
>48. Ke1 Kd4 49. Ra3 Nc3 50. Bf1 Rc1+ 51. Kf2 Kc5 52. Rb3 Bd5 53. Rxc3+ Rxc3 54.
>Ne5 Be6 55. Be2 Kb4 56. Ke1 Kxa4 57. Kd2 Rh3 58. Kc2 Rh4
>0-1
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.