Author: Chessfun
Date: 06:23:07 04/14/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 14, 2001 at 05:23:24, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>On April 13, 2001 at 16:03:50, Tomas Casanovas Martinez wrote:
>
>
>>
>>I have just finished the first round of my new tournament. Invited engines:
>>
>>Deep Fritz, Deep Junior, Deep Shredder, Chess Tiger 14.0, Gambit Tiger 2 and
>>Gandalf 432h. 10 rounds.
>>
>>60 minutes game. Operated manually.
>>
>>White plays in a Pentium 4 1.4 Ghz
>>Black plays in a Dual Pentium 3 2x933 Mhz (About one third faster than my
>>Pentium 4)
>
>Hello, i do not speak for other programs but nearly.
>a P4 at 1.4Ghz is about the speed of a 800MhzPIII for DIEP.
>
>Not to mention dual it is even slower because of increased latencies
>for locking. Only measured single cpu version...
>
>So a dual PIII 933 is going to be well over 2 times faster as a 1.4Ghz p4.
>
>Now that is speed for DIEP.
>
>I have a big pity with the programs on the slower hardware especially
>if the level is fast and operator slow as you lose like 20 minutes
>a program a game then which results in 45 0 level :)
>
>Here my second game slower or equal to 15 0 level against chess tiger 14.0:
>
>I played at fics. i did not play standard level before at fics, hence
>UNR:
>
>Diepeveen (UNR) vs. RebelRex (2441) --- Fri Apr 13, 11:00 PDT 2001
>Rated standard match, initial time: 15 minutes, increment: 15 seconds.
>
>Move Diepeveen RebelRex K7-1333Mhz or 1.33Ghz DDR-RAM.
>---- ---------------- ----------------
> 1. e4 (0:00) e6 (0:00)
> 2. d4 (0:03) b6 (0:00)
> 3. Nc3 (1:33) d5 (0:20)
> 4. e5 (0:53) c5 (0:21)
> 5. Nf3 (0:09) Nc6 (0:15)
> 6. Bb5 (0:05) Bd7 (0:14)
> 7. Bxc6 (0:10) Bxc6 (0:03)
> 8. O-O (0:02) Ne7 (0:24)
> 9. Bg5 (0:07) h6 (0:20)
> 10. Bxe7 (0:08) Bxe7 (0:16)
> 11. Ne2 (0:01) O-O (0:44)
> 12. c3 (0:03) Qd7 (0:18)
> 13. Re1 (0:06) Ba4 (0:10)
> 14. Qd2 (0:14) Bb5 (0:03)
> 15. Rac1 (0:12) Rab8 (0:16)
> 16. h3 (0:04) Rfc8 (0:21)
> 17. Nf4 (0:12) cxd4 (0:46)
> 18. Nxd4 (0:39) Bc4 (0:18)
> 19. b3 (0:08) Ba6 (1:22)
> 20. g3 (0:02) Ba3 (0:15)
> 21. Rb1 (0:05) Qc7 (0:15)
> 22. Re3 (1:15) Be7 (0:00)
> 23. h4 (0:03) Bc5 (0:16)
> 24. b4 (0:25) Bf8 (0:15)
> 25. Nfe2 (0:28) Bc4 (0:19)
> 26. f4 (0:08) Ra8 (0:13)
> 27. a4 (0:15) a5 (0:21)
> 28. b5 (0:06) Qd7 (0:21)
> 29. Nc6 (0:19) Bc5 (0:26)
> 30. Ned4 (0:04) Qc7 (0:12)
> 31. Kh2 (0:33) Qb7 (0:15)
> 32. Rf3 (1:17) Rc7 (0:22)
>
>PLEASE LOOK AT THIS POSITION. How would
>Kramnik do against such beginners?
>
>A beginner positionally outplaying Tiger by at
>least 1000 positional points. Tactical of course 1000 less,
>hence it gets a draw.
>
> 33. Kh1 (1:16) Qc8 (0:20)
> 34. Qc2 (0:39) Kh8 (0:14)
> 35. Rd1 (0:41) Qg8 (0:19)
> 36. g4 (0:04) Qf8 (0:28)
> 37. Rd2 (0:11) Qe8 (0:13)
> 38. Rg2 (0:15) Rac8 (0:15)
> 39. Qd1 (1:48) Qf8 (0:13)
> 40. Rfg3 (0:10) Bxd4 (0:19)
> 41. cxd4 (1:27) f6 (0:17)
> 42. g5 (1:26) fxg5 (1:15)
> 43. fxg5 (3:40) Qf4 (0:00)
> 44. Rg4 (1:17) Qf1+ (0:13)
> 45. Qxf1 (0:04) Bxf1 (0:05)
> 46. Rf2 (0:04) Bh3 (0:19)
> 47. Rgf4 (0:07) Bf5 (1:45)
> 48. Rxf5 (0:16) exf5 (0:00)
> 49. Rxf5 (0:13) g6 (0:15)
> 50. Rf6 (0:08) hxg5 (0:19)
> 51. hxg5 (0:03) Kg7 (0:52)
> 52. Kg2 (1:11) Rh8 (0:22)
> 53. Kg3 (0:07) Rf7 (0:16)
> 54. Kg4 (0:45) Rhf8 (0:00)
> 55. Kf4 (0:16) Rh8 (0:00)
> 56. Kg4 (0:02) Rhf8 (0:17)
> 57. Kf4 (0:02) Rh8 (0:17)
> 58. Kg4 (0:09)
> {Game drawn by repetition} 1/2-1/2
>
>So my score now is 1.5 out of 2 against Tiger14/Gambit tiger 2.0
Not exactly true.
See;
http://site2936.dellhost.com/forums/1/message.shtml?162668
Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.