Author: Uri Blass
Date: 10:26:04 04/14/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 14, 2001 at 10:44:39, Ovidio Santistevan wrote: >I don´t know if somebody talked about this before, but, in my opinion, Tiger >should have kept his relationship with Rebel, and not initiate a new one with >Chessbase. I do not see the problem with doing deals with chessbase. I bought the original tiger14 and I also bought tiger14 for chessbase. The chessbase engines have some advantages and I do with the chessbase interface things that I cannot do with the original tiger(for example to give chessbase programs more than one option to calculate). I can also play engine-engine games between the chessbase programs and the Tigers after I get tiger14 and gambittiger2 for chessbase. I do not see what is bad in giving the customers more options. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.