Author: Chris Taylor
Date: 12:10:42 04/14/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 14, 2001 at 13:26:04, Uri Blass wrote: >On April 14, 2001 at 10:44:39, Ovidio Santistevan wrote: > >>I don´t know if somebody talked about this before, but, in my opinion, Tiger >>should have kept his relationship with Rebel, and not initiate a new one with >>Chessbase. > >I do not see the problem with doing deals with chessbase. >I bought the original tiger14 and I also bought tiger14 for chessbase. > >The chessbase engines have some advantages and I do with the chessbase interface >things that I cannot do with the original tiger(for example to give chessbase >programs more than one option to calculate). > >I can also play engine-engine games between the chessbase programs and the >Tigers after I get tiger14 and gambittiger2 for chessbase. > >I do not see what is bad in giving the customers more options. > >Uri I would like to echo the above sentiments! my own liking is to let these programs play each other, via auto232. The Chessbase gui is quite good for this purpose. Not perfect but usable! Chess Tiger and the Gambit, will make a fine addition to the good list of strong engines. YIPEE!!! Chris Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.