Author: Miguel A. Ballicora
Date: 15:42:49 04/14/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 14, 2001 at 16:10:30, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >On April 14, 2001 at 14:22:41, Mogens Larsen wrote: > >>On April 14, 2001 at 13:18:41, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >> >>>Mogens, >>> >>>ich wäre sehr enttäuscht wenn hier die Programmierer alle ein Anrecht darauf >>>hegen würden gegen Kramnik zu spielen. Die Frage stellt sich nicht. >>> >>>Spielt denn Ehre heute überhaupt keine Rolle mehr ? >>> >>>Wenn ich bei mehreren wichtigen Turnieren nicht gewinnen konnte, würde mir nicht >>>im Traum einfallen zu sagen ... ich will jetzt aber gegen Kramnik spielen oder >>>eine Quallifikation muß her. >>> >>>Das sagt doch nur ein schlechter Verlierer. >>>Machen wir uns doch nichts vor. >>> >>>Alle anderen Ausreden sind lächerlich und sprechen nicht für Ehrgefühl. >>> >>>Ich bin gespannt was die Programmierer selbst sagen. >>>Es kann nur ehrenhaft sein zu sagen: >>> >>>"Stefan hat alles gewonnen er muß uns vertreten" >>> >>>Kommt das nicht scheint das liebe Geld doch wichtiger zu sein als Ehrgefühl. >>>Dies ist zwar auch nichts besonderes in der Gesellschaft aber solange es >>>Möglichkeiten gibt einzuwirken sollten wir diese wahrnehmen. >> >>Frank, >> >>There are no automatic priveleges, except the honour, connected to the World >>Championship title. It isn't a candidate tournament. The opinion of the >>programmers are important, but ultimately it's a decision that BGN must make. >>That is, if they're capable of coming up with a lucid thought among them. >> >>I hope they refrain from using a basement tournament as their method of finding >>the challenger. In principle all chess programs should be allowed to participate >>in a candidate cycle, but that is hardly a realistic option. >> >>What are the requirements for having a shot at the match against Kramnik? The >>incomplete SSDF list? The ten best programs awarded with points from the latest >>major tournaments? >> >>There are more questions than answers IMO. Therefore I find the proposed match >>to be quite ludicrous at the moment. >> >>Mogens. > >Hi Mogens, > >yes I understand your opinion. >Here I agree to 80% :-) > >What do you thinking about his ... > >We playing a big a very big and great / fantastic event. > >*** WM 2001 *** > >The firms which have interest to give mony for a match Kramnik - Computer >program give also money for a high quality tournament organisation. > >I think this idea is better for computer chess (hope to find more people which >have interest on computer chess programs). Furthermore, better as a tournament >from Enrique and also all programmers which have interest can play this new and >great WM 2001 ! > >BTW: But I think Shredder must play :-)) > >Best >Frank Guys, you are overdoing it. Do I have to remind how Kramnik "qualified" to play Kasparov? Here is an idea: Shredder against Gaviota, my program (because I say so). The loser gets the purse and the right to challenge Kramnik. The winner plays Shirov for a sandwich. Regards, Miguel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.