Author: Frank Quisinsky
Date: 16:00:10 04/14/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 14, 2001 at 18:42:49, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote: >On April 14, 2001 at 16:10:30, Frank Quisinsky wrote: > >>On April 14, 2001 at 14:22:41, Mogens Larsen wrote: >> >>>On April 14, 2001 at 13:18:41, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >>> >>>>Mogens, >>>> >>>>ich wäre sehr enttäuscht wenn hier die Programmierer alle ein Anrecht darauf >>>>hegen würden gegen Kramnik zu spielen. Die Frage stellt sich nicht. >>>> >>>>Spielt denn Ehre heute überhaupt keine Rolle mehr ? >>>> >>>>Wenn ich bei mehreren wichtigen Turnieren nicht gewinnen konnte, würde mir nicht >>>>im Traum einfallen zu sagen ... ich will jetzt aber gegen Kramnik spielen oder >>>>eine Quallifikation muß her. >>>> >>>>Das sagt doch nur ein schlechter Verlierer. >>>>Machen wir uns doch nichts vor. >>>> >>>>Alle anderen Ausreden sind lächerlich und sprechen nicht für Ehrgefühl. >>>> >>>>Ich bin gespannt was die Programmierer selbst sagen. >>>>Es kann nur ehrenhaft sein zu sagen: >>>> >>>>"Stefan hat alles gewonnen er muß uns vertreten" >>>> >>>>Kommt das nicht scheint das liebe Geld doch wichtiger zu sein als Ehrgefühl. >>>>Dies ist zwar auch nichts besonderes in der Gesellschaft aber solange es >>>>Möglichkeiten gibt einzuwirken sollten wir diese wahrnehmen. >>> >>>Frank, >>> >>>There are no automatic priveleges, except the honour, connected to the World >>>Championship title. It isn't a candidate tournament. The opinion of the >>>programmers are important, but ultimately it's a decision that BGN must make. >>>That is, if they're capable of coming up with a lucid thought among them. >>> >>>I hope they refrain from using a basement tournament as their method of finding >>>the challenger. In principle all chess programs should be allowed to participate >>>in a candidate cycle, but that is hardly a realistic option. >>> >>>What are the requirements for having a shot at the match against Kramnik? The >>>incomplete SSDF list? The ten best programs awarded with points from the latest >>>major tournaments? >>> >>>There are more questions than answers IMO. Therefore I find the proposed match >>>to be quite ludicrous at the moment. >>> >>>Mogens. >> >>Hi Mogens, >> >>yes I understand your opinion. >>Here I agree to 80% :-) >> >>What do you thinking about his ... >> >>We playing a big a very big and great / fantastic event. >> >>*** WM 2001 *** >> >>The firms which have interest to give mony for a match Kramnik - Computer >>program give also money for a high quality tournament organisation. >> >>I think this idea is better for computer chess (hope to find more people which >>have interest on computer chess programs). Furthermore, better as a tournament >>from Enrique and also all programmers which have interest can play this new and >>great WM 2001 ! >> >>BTW: But I think Shredder must play :-)) >> >>Best >>Frank > >Guys, you are overdoing it. Do I have to remind how Kramnik "qualified" >to play Kasparov? >Here is an idea: Shredder against Gaviota, my program (because I say so). The >loser gets the purse and the right to challenge Kramnik. The winner plays >Shirov for a sandwich. > >Regards, >Miguel Miguel, what do you saying :-)) I think I must programming my chess program. Unfortunately, I little bit Cobol is not good enough for computer chess. But maybe ... In the next years I play against Gaviota and win the sandwich :-)) Best for you and good luck with your program, hope I see your program in one of the next computer chess events. Best Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.