Author: Frank Quisinsky
Date: 16:14:48 04/14/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 14, 2001 at 19:07:53, Feivel Avrum wrote: >On April 14, 2001 at 19:02:38, Frank Quisinsky wrote: > > >>important is not the result Shredder - Tiger ! >>Important are the results ... > >Obviously you are aware that Shredder would be CRUSHED in a tournament game. I >assumed you wouldn't want to back up your claim. > >>Tiger vs. different programs with different playing styles >>Shredder vs. differnt programs with different playing styles > >Hmm...wonder which program is on a recent terrorist excursion on FICS? For that >matter on ICC. I really don't think it's Shredder :) > >>If we have here enough resuls we can say program x is maybe better as program y. > >Frank, we do have enough results (at least preliminary) and they are >overwhelmingly in favor of Tiger 14/Gambit 2. > >Feivel Hi, i have also enough results :-) Example (Gandalf) at the moment: 54% vs. Fritz 6a / Deep Fritz 69% vs. Nimzo 2000b / 7-32 / 8 56% vs. Junior 6a 46% vs. Shredder 5.0 48% vs. Chess Tiger 13.0 55% vs. Gambit-Tiger 1.0 Results with longer time controls from different people !! But not so good results against amateur program when I see the results from Fritz (for one compare). Is Gandalf now the best program and say Steen ... hey my program must play against Kramnik :-)) I don`t know ! Not Gandalf have all the titels, Shredder have the titels and must play. Best Frank
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.