Author: Chessfun
Date: 18:29:07 04/14/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 14, 2001 at 19:14:48, Frank Quisinsky wrote: > >i have also enough results :-) > >Example (Gandalf) at the moment: >54% vs. Fritz 6a / Deep Fritz >69% vs. Nimzo 2000b / 7-32 / 8 >56% vs. Junior 6a >46% vs. Shredder 5.0 >48% vs. Chess Tiger 13.0 >55% vs. Gambit-Tiger 1.0 > >Results with longer time controls from different people !! Amazing results, they certainly look nothing like mine. How many games from each make up these percentages, what are the time controls, computers etc, source of the games. etc. >Is Gandalf now the best program and say Steen ... hey my program must play >against Kramnik :-)) It isn't the best. >I don`t know ! I do. What is interesting Frank is by your own rating list Fritz 6 and Deep Fritz are #1 and #2. While Gandalf is 4. Funny you see the argument based on your rating list for Gandalf but not for Fritz?..hmmm. Sarah.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.