Author: Frank Quisinsky
Date: 18:59:22 04/14/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 14, 2001 at 21:43:56, Chessfun wrote: >On April 14, 2001 at 21:30:20, Frank Quisinsky wrote: > >>Hi Sarah, >> >>>>The text on the Millennium webpage is OK for me. >> >>>I think that says it all. >> >>Sorry Sarah, you posted for hours the following text, here with my answere ... >> >>>Hi Frank, >>> Seems like an Echo? >> >>Hi Sarah, >> >>yes the next Echo is my CCE tourney with all Chess-Base programs. I think you >>have forget to write this, sorry ! > > >Frank, in your own rating list Fritz 6 and Deep Fritz are #1 and #2. >Earlier you were making a case for Gandalf #4. Why therefore can you >also make a case for Fritz?. Hi Sarah, please see my other message, I wrote this for seconds in my fantastic English. >>In German fora the opinions are ... >> >>Frank is writing about Chess-Base programs ... >>He work for Chess-Base ... >> >>Frank is writing about Millennium programs ... >>He work for Millennium ... > >You missed Gandalf :-) Yes, yes ! Very important :-)) OK, you have right when you say that I wrote to many things about Gandalf. On the other hand I like this program and I have also problems not to say this. Better is when I write here on my official page not so many things about Gandalf and more about other programs. But Sarah ... Gandalf is a WinBoard engine, reason enough for me :-) >>Sarah, I dislike this ! >>Your comment ... >>"I think that says it all." >You are right Frank. I apologize for my bitchy tone...Sorry. OK, I write also in all my messages not the best things. >>Sarah I think that we make a big mistake for the future and for computer chess. >> >>I have the same opinion compare Ossi Weiner in the case. >>I say this, no problem ! > > >Just some of the words selected like "Mickey Mouse" you also agreed with >to me that's a problem. OK Mickey Mouse ... Hm, not easy to answere of this question :-( I think this is not the best name but a good way to say with this word how important is this tourney compare a world championchip. In my opinion are user tournaments better to create a opinion about the playing strenght. Here the tourney from you, Enrique and all other are interesting. But all this tourneys are private tourneys, not more (also my CCE tourney, is so interesting compare 100.000 CCE tourneys). >>What is here not right in your opinion, that I have the same opinion compare >>Ossi Weiner :-)) >No just the selection and wording of the opinion. In reads tainted with >bias and is overly critical in wording of a candidate match run by Enrique. I have not a bad opinion from Enrique. I swiched eMails with Enrique in a time where have big private problems. Enrique gave good tips and I like this what Enrique made but all this is at the moment not important. Important is that the World Champion can playing against the World Champion Kramnik. >>Sorry Sarah, but I wrote here enough and I have a clear opinion. >>You have an other opinion and this is good but your opinion is for me not clear. > >Opinions are fine, I just try as best I can to keep mine from being biased >and try to remain objective as to the solution. In this case with Millinniums >stated position it's clear IMO they can be left out. >>I think I play tomorrow a blitz WM :-)) >Good luck ! A typical comment from my ex girlfriend :-) Or better ... If you mean you need this ... please make this :-)) Best Frank >Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.