Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 09:54:17 04/15/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 15, 2001 at 09:44:52, Chessfun wrote: >On April 15, 2001 at 03:33:05, Sandro Necchi wrote: > >>On April 15, 2001 at 03:29:39, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On April 15, 2001 at 03:05:47, Sandro Necchi wrote: >>> >>>>On April 14, 2001 at 21:11:41, Chessfun wrote: >>>> >>>>>On April 14, 2001 at 18:06:44, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Hello Christophe, >>>>>> >>>>>>the first, a good answere ! >>>>>> >>>>>>>I have already given my point of view on this issue. >>>>>> >>>>>>This is right. >>>>>> >>>>>>>In short: >>>>>>>1) I still do not understand the arbitrary choice of Deep Fritz, Deep Junior and >>>>>>>Deep Shredder >>>>>> >>>>>>I agreed full with you ! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>That isn't what I've been reading till now. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>2) Why is the winner of such a closed tournament supposed to perform the best >>>>>>>against a player of a totally different kind? >>>>>> >>>>>>Also this is right ! >>>>>> >>>>>>But which qualification is better as all the tourneys which Shredder won ? >>>>>>We have no a better compare ! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>If we look at the facts forget all thse other titles you keep claiming Frank, >>>>>Shredder only won one as a SMP machine. So, you have a program that should play >>>>>after winning one 10 round or so tourney?. >>>> >>>>Shredder tournament version won all the tournaments since 1999! No other >>>>tournament version did the same. These are facts, the rest are words. >>>>Also you do not have our latest version. How can you know how strong is Deep >>>>Shredder now? >>> >>>You also do not have the latest Deep Fritz or Deep Junior(not commercial >>>version). >> >>I did not say the contrary. >>> >>>We cannot know how strong are the programs now and this is the reason that we >>>need a tournament to decide about the player who plays against kramnik. >> >>No I desagree. After the tournament one programmer may make further >>improvements, so it will never ends. >>The point is that the latest tournaments were won by Shredder, so Shredder must >>have the right to the match. If the next title will be won by another program, >>that program will have the right to the next match. It is very simple!! >> >>Sandro Necchi > >Not really so simple. Given that Millennium will not comply with the stated >terms for such a match. If the organizers want to play the strongest program >now and also want the chess computer community to accept the choice not many >would agree on such an automatic selection. OK, as far as I am concerned, we are ready to play and win again with our latest version. Of course we will use our latest version. I do not agree with these rules, but I am not the one to decide. Sandro Necchi > >Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.