Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 14:37:05 04/15/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 15, 2001 at 12:54:17, Sandro Necchi wrote: >On April 15, 2001 at 09:44:52, Chessfun wrote: > >>On April 15, 2001 at 03:33:05, Sandro Necchi wrote: >> >>>On April 15, 2001 at 03:29:39, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>On April 15, 2001 at 03:05:47, Sandro Necchi wrote: >>>> >>>>>On April 14, 2001 at 21:11:41, Chessfun wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On April 14, 2001 at 18:06:44, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Hello Christophe, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>the first, a good answere ! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I have already given my point of view on this issue. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>This is right. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>In short: >>>>>>>>1) I still do not understand the arbitrary choice of Deep Fritz, Deep Junior and >>>>>>>>Deep Shredder >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I agreed full with you ! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>That isn't what I've been reading till now. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>2) Why is the winner of such a closed tournament supposed to perform the best >>>>>>>>against a player of a totally different kind? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Also this is right ! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>But which qualification is better as all the tourneys which Shredder won ? >>>>>>>We have no a better compare ! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>If we look at the facts forget all thse other titles you keep claiming Frank, >>>>>>Shredder only won one as a SMP machine. So, you have a program that should play >>>>>>after winning one 10 round or so tourney?. >>>>> >>>>>Shredder tournament version won all the tournaments since 1999! No other >>>>>tournament version did the same. These are facts, the rest are words. >>>>>Also you do not have our latest version. How can you know how strong is Deep >>>>>Shredder now? >>>> >>>>You also do not have the latest Deep Fritz or Deep Junior(not commercial >>>>version). >>> >>>I did not say the contrary. >>>> >>>>We cannot know how strong are the programs now and this is the reason that we >>>>need a tournament to decide about the player who plays against kramnik. >>> >>>No I desagree. After the tournament one programmer may make further >>>improvements, so it will never ends. >>>The point is that the latest tournaments were won by Shredder, so Shredder must >>>have the right to the match. If the next title will be won by another program, >>>that program will have the right to the next match. It is very simple!! >>> >>>Sandro Necchi >> >>Not really so simple. Given that Millennium will not comply with the stated >>terms for such a match. If the organizers want to play the strongest program >>now and also want the chess computer community to accept the choice not many >>would agree on such an automatic selection. > >OK, as far as I am concerned, we are ready to play and win again with our latest >version. Of course we will use our latest version. >I do not agree with these rules, but I am not the one to decide. Hi! As you know, unfortunately Shredder is out, I and many others should have loved to see a challenger match between IMO the best SMP-programs Deep-Shredder, Deep-Fritz and Deep-Junior. Millenium couldn't accept the conditions, if this is because of the entry-fee or any other reasons that's up to us to speculate about. Bertil >Sandro Necchi >> >>Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.