Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 16:52:04 04/15/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 15, 2001 at 18:49:15, Chessfun wrote: >The games I'm sure will be available for others to see. >Credability don't only come from programmer involvement, it also somes from >the arrangements made. That goes without saying, hence the requirement for openness. >Suggest challengers? who else is there but Deep's Shredder, Junior and Fritz. >Why invite so many other programs when that prolongs the event and simply will] >produce known results elsewhere. I'm sure that both Crafty and Ferret would be capable adversaries. Early, or any, notification of the qualification event would allow authors of the mentioned programs a chance to optimize the performance and for others to make an effort. It probably wouldn't have resulted in an abundance of programs, but it demanded little effort. >I am sure once the event is set all the information you seek on openness and >conditions, tournament parameters and results will be given for all to see. They already are, and the arrangement as such sounds okay. The exciting part is choosing between Deep Junior or Deep Fritz ;-). >Sometimes you need faith and trust :-) That's religion, not computer chess :-). Mogens.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.