Author: Drazen Marovic
Date: 20:42:05 04/15/01
Go up one level in this thread
>- Programmers are free to develop their engines until October 1st, provided >that they will send regular updates to Kramnik. The idea is to avoid the >DB-Kasparov scenario, in which Kasparov had no idea of the opponent. > What i wonder, and of course my thinking may be flawed here. If say player (X) has the exact copy of the program he is to play in the match, along with similar hardware. He then plays test games which he finds the computer loses in. Then it seems to me, that the games can in many circumstances can be recreated at the board during the match creating wins without the slightest thought. This especially because the program used in the match wont have any learning experience of the games played by player (X) with his home computer. Of course you can't force the computer to play the exact line but in many cases this can be done, in fact i have played a win against Fritz, later had to reinstall, and then played the same identical win over before. The programs short of it being Deep Blue already have almost no chance against Volodya, giving him the program before hand. Why even have the match? Yes i am saying the result is a foregone conclusion. D
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.