Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Latest millenium news?

Author: Mogens Larsen

Date: 23:00:45 04/15/01

Go up one level in this thread


On April 15, 2001 at 20:59:59, Chessfun wrote:

>I would have liked to have read posts on this subject from both Bruce and
>Dr. Hyatt.

Yes, that would have been interesting. OTOH it's not particularly important if
any of the possible particpants would have been interested or not. I've tried to
explain to you, so far without too much success, that the problem lies in lack
of ambition.

As far as I'm concerned anyone can play against Kramnik, but I resent the fact
that a good opportunity is wasted with the simplest and least ambitious of all
solutions. No matter how nice the print on the invitations were or the view over
the bay. All in all it boils down to a simple autoplay match between two engines
at the moment. Despite the careful selection process (hmm... including DB says
it all IMO) none of the programs can claim to be the strongest computer program
or the best adversary to Kramnik. If that appeals to you, then fine, no problem.
But it's the lowest common denominator. And that is without being paranoid about
hidden agendas.

The other possibility would be to arrange a candidate tournament with SMP
capable programs as I've mentioned before. In accordance with the World
Championships of old. It requires planning, time and money to make room for
early notice to the computer chess community and tournament arrangements. All of
which could have been provided with a little effort IMO given the organisation
responsible and the country supposed to host the match (USA). That would also
contribute to the development of computer chess in general to a higher extent
than the sole challenge from the usual suspects.

That is my opinion and I don't believe that being more ambitious would
jeopardize the match and that it's now or never. In principle it doesn't matter
for Kramnik as long as his preparations remain the same. I prefer the
professional (serious, thorough and with effort) option given the known
alternative.

Mogens.



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.