Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: About the qualificaton Kramnik vs computer

Author: Mogens Larsen

Date: 23:02:42 04/15/01

Go up one level in this thread


On April 16, 2001 at 01:23:24, Uri Blass wrote:

>On April 15, 2001 at 18:44:06, Bertil Eklund wrote:
>
>>
>>Here is some news about the upcoming event:
>>
>>
>>- We invited 4 programs: DB and the Deeps of Fritz, Shredder and Junior.
>>"We" is BGN and Enrique Irazoqui, with Bertil Eklund as consultant.
>>
>>- DB is obvious. Fritz has been leading everything in computer chess, short
>>of a Swiss open of 7 rounds that receives the name "world championship".
>>Shredder is strong and got the 2 last titles, whatever they mean, although
>>it never topped the SSDF list, never won long tournaments. Junior is also
>>strong, was first in the SSDF list about a year ago, won some long
>>tournaments, achieved a PR of 2702 last year in Dortmund. The rest is either
>>not strong enough or not SMP ready, which means they don't have a chance and
>>their inclusion would only increase randomness.
>
>How do you know that Ferret is not strong enough?
>
>I also think that Crafty should be invited and use the best hardware that it can
>use and if it means that Crafty has an hardware advantage because of the alpha
>relative to the commercial it should have an hardware advantage(every program
>should get the best hardware that it can use)
>
>I also think that every SMP should be invited because you cannot be sure that a
>program is not strong enough before testing but only after testing and the fact
>that a program was not strong enough in the past does not prove that it is not
>strong enough today.

And those that are strong enough were not given the opportunity to try and
utilize SMP.

Mogens.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.