Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 23:31:35 04/15/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 15, 2001 at 17:37:05, Bertil Eklund wrote: >On April 15, 2001 at 12:54:17, Sandro Necchi wrote: > >>On April 15, 2001 at 09:44:52, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>On April 15, 2001 at 03:33:05, Sandro Necchi wrote: >>> >>>>On April 15, 2001 at 03:29:39, Uri Blass wrote: >>>> >>>>>On April 15, 2001 at 03:05:47, Sandro Necchi wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On April 14, 2001 at 21:11:41, Chessfun wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On April 14, 2001 at 18:06:44, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Hello Christophe, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>the first, a good answere ! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>I have already given my point of view on this issue. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>This is right. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>In short: >>>>>>>>>1) I still do not understand the arbitrary choice of Deep Fritz, Deep Junior and >>>>>>>>>Deep Shredder >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I agreed full with you ! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>That isn't what I've been reading till now. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>2) Why is the winner of such a closed tournament supposed to perform the best >>>>>>>>>against a player of a totally different kind? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Also this is right ! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>But which qualification is better as all the tourneys which Shredder won ? >>>>>>>>We have no a better compare ! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>If we look at the facts forget all thse other titles you keep claiming Frank, >>>>>>>Shredder only won one as a SMP machine. So, you have a program that should play >>>>>>>after winning one 10 round or so tourney?. >>>>>> >>>>>>Shredder tournament version won all the tournaments since 1999! No other >>>>>>tournament version did the same. These are facts, the rest are words. >>>>>>Also you do not have our latest version. How can you know how strong is Deep >>>>>>Shredder now? >>>>> >>>>>You also do not have the latest Deep Fritz or Deep Junior(not commercial >>>>>version). >>>> >>>>I did not say the contrary. >>>>> >>>>>We cannot know how strong are the programs now and this is the reason that we >>>>>need a tournament to decide about the player who plays against kramnik. >>>> >>>>No I desagree. After the tournament one programmer may make further >>>>improvements, so it will never ends. >>>>The point is that the latest tournaments were won by Shredder, so Shredder must >>>>have the right to the match. If the next title will be won by another program, >>>>that program will have the right to the next match. It is very simple!! >>>> >>>>Sandro Necchi >>> >>>Not really so simple. Given that Millennium will not comply with the stated >>>terms for such a match. If the organizers want to play the strongest program >>>now and also want the chess computer community to accept the choice not many >>>would agree on such an automatic selection. >> >>OK, as far as I am concerned, we are ready to play and win again with our latest >>version. Of course we will use our latest version. >>I do not agree with these rules, but I am not the one to decide. > >Hi! > >As you know, unfortunately Shredder is out, I and many others should have loved >to see a challenger match between IMO the best SMP-programs Deep-Shredder, >Deep-Fritz and Deep-Junior. Millenium couldn't accept the conditions, if this is >because of the entry-fee or any other reasons that's up to us to speculate >about. Hi Bertil, well I can live without it, too. > >Bertil Ciao Sandro > >>Sandro Necchi >>> >>>Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.