Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:18:07 04/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 16, 2001 at 02:22:16, Sandro Necchi wrote: >On April 15, 2001 at 14:56:41, Chessfun wrote: > >>On April 15, 2001 at 12:42:05, Sandro Necchi wrote: >> >>>On April 15, 2001 at 09:38:15, Chessfun wrote: >>> >>>>On April 15, 2001 at 03:05:47, Sandro Necchi wrote: >>>> >>>>>On April 14, 2001 at 21:11:41, Chessfun wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On April 14, 2001 at 18:06:44, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Hello Christophe, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>the first, a good answere ! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I have already given my point of view on this issue. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>This is right. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>In short: >>>>>>>>1) I still do not understand the arbitrary choice of Deep Fritz, Deep Junior and >>>>>>>>Deep Shredder >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I agreed full with you ! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>That isn't what I've been reading till now. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>2) Why is the winner of such a closed tournament supposed to perform the best >>>>>>>>against a player of a totally different kind? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Also this is right ! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>But which qualification is better as all the tourneys which Shredder won ? >>>>>>>We have no a better compare ! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>If we look at the facts forget all thse other titles you keep claiming Frank, >>>>>>Shredder only won one as a SMP machine. So, you have a program that should play >>>>>>after winning one 10 round or so tourney?. >>>>> >>>>>Shredder tournament version won all the tournaments since 1999! No other >>>>>tournament version did the same. These are facts, the rest are words. >>>>>Also you do not have our latest version. How can you know how strong is Deep >>>>>Shredder now? >>>>> >>>>>Sandro Necchi >>>> >>>>I do not have either the latest Deep Fritz or Deep Junior version....same thing. >>>> >>>>If you won't comply with the stated rules anyway and the others will, then you >>>>automatically in this case disqualify yourself so regardless of how much better >>>>the current version is to the released version it's mute. >>> >>>I think you are disqualifying the world champion title. >>> >>>that's all. >>> >>>Sandro >> >>Actually I couldn't care who the World Champion was. I want to see the strongest >>possible Computer v Humans play. > >Yes, because you do not work for one year to win a tournament and so you do not >know what it means! I think that exactly for this reason there should be a tournament to decide about the program to play against Kramnik. It was not known before WCCC that this tournament is for the right to play against kramnik. If it is agreed before the tournament that winning WCCC gives the program the right to play a match against kramnik in 2001 then I have no problem with it but thinks like this should be agreed before the tournament so everyone knows before it what the results of the tournament mean. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.