Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 00:35:12 04/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 16, 2001 at 03:18:07, Uri Blass wrote: >On April 16, 2001 at 02:22:16, Sandro Necchi wrote: > >>On April 15, 2001 at 14:56:41, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>On April 15, 2001 at 12:42:05, Sandro Necchi wrote: >>> >>>>On April 15, 2001 at 09:38:15, Chessfun wrote: >>>> >>>>>On April 15, 2001 at 03:05:47, Sandro Necchi wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On April 14, 2001 at 21:11:41, Chessfun wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On April 14, 2001 at 18:06:44, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Hello Christophe, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>the first, a good answere ! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>I have already given my point of view on this issue. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>This is right. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>In short: >>>>>>>>>1) I still do not understand the arbitrary choice of Deep Fritz, Deep Junior and >>>>>>>>>Deep Shredder >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I agreed full with you ! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>That isn't what I've been reading till now. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>2) Why is the winner of such a closed tournament supposed to perform the best >>>>>>>>>against a player of a totally different kind? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Also this is right ! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>But which qualification is better as all the tourneys which Shredder won ? >>>>>>>>We have no a better compare ! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>If we look at the facts forget all thse other titles you keep claiming Frank, >>>>>>>Shredder only won one as a SMP machine. So, you have a program that should play >>>>>>>after winning one 10 round or so tourney?. >>>>>> >>>>>>Shredder tournament version won all the tournaments since 1999! No other >>>>>>tournament version did the same. These are facts, the rest are words. >>>>>>Also you do not have our latest version. How can you know how strong is Deep >>>>>>Shredder now? >>>>>> >>>>>>Sandro Necchi >>>>> >>>>>I do not have either the latest Deep Fritz or Deep Junior version....same thing. >>>>> >>>>>If you won't comply with the stated rules anyway and the others will, then you >>>>>automatically in this case disqualify yourself so regardless of how much better >>>>>the current version is to the released version it's mute. >>>> >>>>I think you are disqualifying the world champion title. >>>> >>>>that's all. >>>> >>>>Sandro >>> >>>Actually I couldn't care who the World Champion was. I want to see the strongest >>>possible Computer v Humans play. >> >>Yes, because you do not work for one year to win a tournament and so you do not >>know what it means! > >I think that exactly for this reason there should be a tournament to decide >about the program to play against Kramnik. Sorry I do not agree. All this would cost money and time. > >It was not known before WCCC that this tournament is for the right to play >against kramnik. Yes, but still the world title should mean something. > >If it is agreed before the tournament that winning WCCC gives the program the >right to play a match against kramnik in 2001 then I have no problem with it but >thinks like this should be agreed before the tournament so everyone knows before >it what the results of the tournament mean. Well, looking the conditions they ask I do not agree to partecipate. That's not chess. > >Uri Sandro
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.