Author: Rajen Gupta
Date: 08:07:52 04/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 16, 2001 at 10:11:16, Dan Andersson wrote: >I sincerely hope that you do this not as a representative of SSDF but privately. >If not, what can I say more than that the organisations credibility takes a >major hit. If you do it as a person, do you have a written contract forbidding >any mention of your connection to SSDF by the organisers xpect no end of misuse >IMO. I do not begrudge you a trip to a warmer clime, but you need to realize: >there is no free lunch. > >Regards Dn Andersson why should he not mention his connection wth the SSDF? He in fact should mentionthis connection after all that is what gives him the qualification and credibility to supervise such a match.whenever you read news reports about any event and a name (esp as an expert)is mentioned, they always mention the persons affiliation.(eh john henderson of the scotsman or MIG from kasparov.com etc). even if it is a free lunch since you aren't paying for it either directly or indirectly why do you feel so jealous about it? (is it becuse you rather than bertil ought to have been invited?) rajen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.