Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: About the qualificaton Kramnik vs computer

Author: Andreas Schwartmann

Date: 08:16:45 04/16/01

Go up one level in this thread


On April 15, 2001 at 18:44:06, Bertil Eklund wrote:

>
>Here is some news about the upcoming event:
>
>
>- We invited 4 programs: DB and the Deeps of Fritz, Shredder and Junior.
>"We" is BGN and Enrique Irazoqui, with Bertil Eklund as consultant.
>
>- DB is obvious. Fritz has been leading everything in computer chess, short
>of a Swiss open of 7 rounds that receives the name "world championship".
>Shredder is strong and got the 2 last titles, whatever they mean, although
>it never topped the SSDF list, never won long tournaments. Junior is also
>strong, was first in the SSDF list about a year ago, won some long
>tournaments, achieved a PR of 2702 last year in Dortmund. The rest is either
>not strong enough or not SMP ready, which means they don't have a chance and
>their inclusion would only increase randomness.


I like almost everything you wrote but for two things:

"Non-SMP-engines won't stand a chance". In the case of Tiger 14.0 I strongly
doubt that. I would go so far as to say that Tiger might even top your next SSDF
List. It would be a strange event if only the 4 afore mentioned programs decide
who amongst them is fit to face Kramnik and the (most likely) #1 of SSDF is not
one of them.

I don't like the idea that Kramnik will get engine updates up to the last
moment. That does not give any chosen engine a fair start. Kramnik might (and
surely will) find holes in the engine's handlings of certain opening lines just
by experimenting. He will use this knowledge doubtlessly. I think it would be
fair enough to provide the World Champion with publicly available games of his
to-be-decided opponent.

Andreas




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.