Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: About the qualificaton Kramnik vs computer

Author: Chessfun

Date: 19:12:55 04/16/01

Go up one level in this thread


On April 16, 2001 at 03:40:49, Thorsten Czub wrote:

>On April 16, 2001 at 03:37:07, Chessfun wrote:
>>More slander Thorsten?.
>>Why can't you simply use arguments to put forth your perceived point?.
>>
>>Sarah.
>
>it's obvious why, or ?
>
>why do you defend things you know it makes no sense to defend.

Why do you makes statements without fact?.

>because you don't want to believe what you see is real. you thought
>it is different, and now you begin to realize that it isn't different.

Why don't you present some argument to make a point?.

>suddenly your eyes open and you see everything clear in front of you.

My eyes are always open....are yours?.

>only that you don't wanna believe it as real, don't you ?

It's is real...no....or?

>for me it is easier. i always said so.
>i don't had to believe. i had the data before you saw them.

You are always one step ahead of everyone Thorsten, must be that spy
in the chessbase camp....or?.

Sarah.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.