Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Support 4 single chip chess v Kramnik

Author: Chessfun

Date: 20:03:49 04/16/01

Go up one level in this thread


On April 16, 2001 at 22:39:58, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On April 16, 2001 at 16:39:37, Mogens Larsen wrote:
>
>>On April 16, 2001 at 16:24:46, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>>Just goes to show that the world isn't always fair.  :(  I generally try
>>>to remember such things, and at some point, the "other side" will need some
>>>help.  But not from me.  I can't believe any of this mess is happening.  I
>>>would hope the _authors_ of the programs would do the right thing themselves
>>>and simply say "my program won't participate, this is a right earned by
>>>Shredder and it is Shredder or nothing..."
>>
>>That would indeed be a nice gesture and in compliance with tournament results as
>>you mention. But I seriously doubt that the invited programs still left will
>>miss this golden opportunity for publicity.
>>
>>Mogens.
>
>
>Let's see if any have the courage to stand up (or sit down) and do what
>is right.  I doubt it, but I might be surprised...

In all these posts in favor of Shredder you are making, you are forgetting
one fact. They have been trying to negotiate for three months and have failed.

What do you do when you can't reach agreement on terms? you look elsewhere,
which is exactly what has happened.

Also who says this has to be billed as the World Champion (Human) v The world
Champion (Computer)? As I understand it they wish to play a match with the
strongest computer program, there was no requrement that a known strongest
already existed.

Sarah.







This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.