Author: Uri Blass
Date: 22:43:58 04/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 17, 2001 at 01:39:13, Uri Blass wrote: >On April 17, 2001 at 01:07:08, John Hatcher wrote: > >>On April 17, 2001 at 00:58:23, Aloisio Ponti Lopes wrote: >> >>>This is a game that was played just for fun (1 processor for 2 engines... :-( >>>don't have the money to buy my dual). Time is 2 min. + 12 sec/ move increment. >>>Moves were entered manually. >>> >>>[Event "Top-Ten"] >>>[Site "Ponti Chess Club"] >>>[Date "2001.04.17"] >>>[Round "1"] >>>[White "Chess Tiger 14.0"] >>>[Black "Fritz 6"] >>>[Result "1-0"] >>>[Opening "B23 Sicilian: Closed"] >>> >>>1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 g6 3.Nf3 Nc6 4.a3 Bg7 5.Rb1 e6 6.b4 b6 7.Bb2 d6 8.Bb5 Ne7 9.Nd5 >>>O-O 10.Nf6+ Bxf6 >>>11.Bxf6 Bb7 12.O-O cxb4 13.axb4 a6 14.Bd3 Nb8 15.Re1 Nd7 16.Bg5 Re8 17.Bh6 Qc7 >>>18.Qe2 a5 >>>19.Qe3 a4 20.Bb5 Bc6 21.Qc3 e5 22.Ng5 Rec8 23.Qf3 f6 24.Bc4+ d5 25.exd5 Bb7 >>>26.Ba2 Qxc2 >>>27.d6+ Qxa2 28.Qxb7 fxg5 29.dxe7 Qe6 30.Bxg5 Rcb8 31.Qe4 Re8 32.d4 a3 33.dxe5 a2 >>>34.Ra1 >>>Kg7 35.f4 h6 36.Bh4 Ra4 37.g3 Nc5 38.Bf6+ Kh7 39.Qc2 Qb3 40.Re2 Qxb4 41.Rxa2 >>>Qd4+ 42.Rf2 >>>Rc4 43.Qb2 Qd5 44.Rf1 Qc6 45.Rc1 Nd3 46.Rxc4 Qxc4 47.Qd2 Qc5+ 48.Kg2 Qd5+ 49.Kh3 >>>Qe6+ 50.Kh4 >>>Qf5 51.g4 Qe4 52.Kg3 Qd4 53.h3 Qg1+ 54.Qg2 Qd4 55.Qf1 Qe3+ 56.Qf3 Qd4 57.g5 Nc5 >>>58.Kh2 hxg5 >>>59.fxg5 b5 60.Qg4 Qxg4 61.hxg4 Ne6 62.Ra6 Nc7 63.Rd6 Kg8 64.e6 Kh7 65.Kg3 Kg8 >>>66.Kf4 >>> >>>I can't believe it is Fritz in Zugzwang... oh, I see, it's Tiger with the white >>>pieces... ;-) >>> >>>Nxe6+ >>>67.Rxe6 Kf7 68.Rb6 b4 69.Rxb4 Ra8 70.Rb3 Re8 71.Rd3 Ke6 72.Rd8 Rxe7 73.Bxe7 Kxe7 >>>74.Rd5 >>>Ke6 75.Rd2 Ke7 76.Ke5 Kf7 77.Rd7+ Ke8 >>> >>>[D] 4k3/3R4/6p1/4K1P1/6P1/8/8/8 w - - 0 78 >>> >>>Very interesting, I could not see the reason why Tiger did not play Ke6 here. >>>The funniest thing is that Fritz 6 thinks that this is the strongest too. >>>Nalimov tablebases enabled for both of them (all 3-4-5 men from the WM-Paket 4 >>>Cds Nalimov collection, installed to a separate partition of the hard disk). >>> >>>78.Kf6 Kxd7 79.Kxg6 Ke6 80.Kh6 Ke5 81.g6 Ke6 82.g7 >>>Kf7 83.Kh7 Kf6 84.g8Q Ke5 85.Qd8 Ke4 86.g5 Ke3 87.g6 Ke2 88.g7 Ke1 89.g8Q Ke2 >>>90.Qg2+ Ke1 >>>91.Qdd2# 1-0 >>> >>>Not the way a GM or a strong human player would mate Fritz... >>> >>>A. Ponti >> >>Well, this is just one man's opinion, but I would play 78. Kf6 without giving it >>much thought. It's simple, it's sure, and an elementary win can be calculated >>(by a human) in a few seconds. The simpler, the cleaner, the better. >> >>The humble opinion of a 2116 rated Expert. >> >>John > >The simplest way to win is the following: >1.Ke6 Kf8 2.Re7 Kg8 3.Rf7 Kh8 4.Kf6 Kg8 5.Kxg6 Kh8 6.Rf8# > >Uri I can add that this is not the fastest way to mate. The fastest way to mate and 2.Kf6 Kg8 3.Rd3 Kh7 4.Kf7 Kh8 Rh3# is faster
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.