Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Legitimacy is important. (Kramnik vs ????)

Author: guy haworth

Date: 11:02:24 04/17/01

Go up one level in this thread



Today, in the London Times, Raymond Keene referred to a computer-tournament at
Cadaques (?) being imminent to decide the challenger for a Kramnik-Computer
match.

I presume we are referring to the same event - but is RK's report correct or
just attempted wish-fulfillment?


RK is associated with the so called 'BrainGames Network', BGN, which presumably
relies on creating events to generate revenue.  Boxing went the same way.

BGN did not hesitate to call the Kasparov-Kramnik Match in London a "World
Championship", despite the fact that there were no inclusive qualifying rounds
of any description.  They were presumably competing for the
Kasparov-Kramnik-World-Title or the BGN-World-Title.

While the ICCA has been the sole organiser of World Computer Chess
Championships, there is nothing to stop anyone creating 'World Titles' if they
want to.  A pity that the currency can be devalued as easily as this.

However organised by whoever, it would be good if human-computer events were
more frequent and also had greater significance and validity.

G




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.